Subscriber Login

Forgot Your Username?
Forgot Your Password?
Outsiders can determine political future for North PDF Print E-mail

Letter to the Editor:

How many times have references to Dane County derisively suggested that the politically liberal atmosphere of Madison has too much influence on the conservative North Woods?

How many times have right-wingers bemoaned the influence of the more progressive community in the greater Madison area, and implied that “those people” do not represent “our values” and “our concerns?”

Well, guess what boys and girls, the Supreme Court just ruled in McCutcheon v. FEC that there can be no aggregate limits to campaign contributions. What in the heck does that mean? In fishing, it would mean that you could catch 1,000 walleyes a day, so long as they didn’t all come from the same lake.

It means that you can forget about those liberals around populous Madison controlling the lives of conservatives in rural Wisconsin. The Roberts court has decided that free speech for the people of Alabama means that they too can determine the political future of the people of Vilas County. It means that they can contribute not only to those who represent them in their own state, but to candidates in other states, in other districts, in other precincts — if you’ve got the money, honey, you can take the time to contribute the maximum amount to as many elections in as many places as you wish.

Remember “no taxation without representation?” Well, how about “no representation where it doesn’t concern you?” Not as catchy, to be sure, how about “mind your own damned business!” Of course, if you want to rule the world, I?guess you could look at every election as being “your business.”

If you also had the resources to support that desire, like the Koch brothers ($12 billion profit last year), or the Walton family (more wealth than the combined wealth of the bottom 42% of American families), you could reach into petty cash and spread 100s of millions of dollars around the country to influence elections (buy Congress) and virtually guarantee, among other things, that the estate tax will be of historic interest only, and that climate change denial (and big oil profits) will continue until hurricanes like Katrina and Sandy are commonplace, building codes in the West Coast require nonflammable materials, and the cities of New Orleans, New York, Boston and Miami secede to the lost continent of Atlantis.

Terrance Moe

Three Lakes

Tuesday, May 27, 2014 12:49 PM


-6 #2 Frank Gabl 2014-06-02 07:29
This, “boys and girls,” is the classic definition of hypocrisy since it’s coming from a collectivist who advocates for everyone’s most precious asset being exclusively controlled by bureaucrats in a land far, far away named D.C.

For the Record:

There has been “zero” global warming over the past 17 years which has resulted in the lowering of the average global temperature from 1.4 Fahrenheit to only 1.1 since 1880, and that insignificant increase is nothing more than a result of development during the preceding 134 years including, concrete, asphalt, structures, etc.

Contrary to the hysteria put forth over “Hurricane Sandy,” Sandy, was barely a Category I hurricane when it made landfall with winds of a mere 80 MPH. The inconvenient fact remains for alarmists that there hasn’t been a “major” hurricane (category 3 or larger) for nine years since Katrina and Rita in 2005 - making the period the longest drought since the 1880’s.
0 #1 2014-05-27 15:31
Kind of like how Soros, Buffet, and Gates do it then for the liberals then eh?

Why did you not mention them?

Add comment

Comments exceeding 1,000 characters will not be accepted. Please refrain from using texting language and spell out all words. All comments are reviewed and must be approved before they are posted.

Security code